When we talk to administrators on unionized campuses, they tend to describe the constraints they face and inability to make positive changes for VITAL (visiting, instructional, teaching, and lecturing) faculty. Administrators admit that these contingent faculty have subpar working conditions, but campus leaders remain hamstrung when it comes to making alterations. Administrators note that contracts dictate so many parameters that they are unable to offer professional development to VITAL faculty or include them meaningfully in governance, for example. This common refrain is more myth than truth. On each of these campuses, we have spoken to union leaders who welcome the idea of making changes to better support VITAL faculty. Collective bargaining and contracts should be seen as a site of potential and possibility, not as constraints.
From “Rename and Remain” to “Reframe and Regain”: Reimagining Campus Inclusiveness
In my last article, I highlighted the crucial strategies of “person-first” and “targeted universalism” amid the wave of anti-DEI legislation in higher education. Initially, many of us embraced a “rename
Molly Kerby
July 7, 2025
